The Difference Between Emigrate and Immigrate

These two verbs have similar meanings, but they differ in point of view.Emigrate means to leave one country to settle in another. Immigrate means to settle in a country where one isnt a native. ​Emigrate stresses leaving; ​immigrate stresses arriving. For example, from the point of view of the British, you emigrate when you leave England to settle in Canada. From the point of view of the Canadians, you have immigrated to Canada and are considered an immigrant. Emigrate describes the move relative to the place of departure. Immigrate describes it relative to the place of arrival. Examples The film Amreeka tells the story of a Palestinian mother and son who emigrate from the West Bank to Illinois.The modern American Christmas tree originated with German Lutherans and spread to Pennsylvania after they began to immigrate here in the 18th century. Practice Understanding the Difference (a) When my grandparents decided to _____ to the U.S., there was no one waiting for them here.(b) At the end of the Greco-Turkish War of 1919–1922, thousands  of people were compelled to _____  from  Asia Minor to Greece. Answers (a) When my grandparents decided to  immigrate  to the U.S., there was no one waiting for them here.(b) At the end of the Greco-Turkish War of 1919–1922, thousands  of people were compelled to  emigrate  from  Asia Minor to Greece.

Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill - 948 Words

What would you do if given the opportunity to take one unwilling person’s life to save five other people’s lives? Would you do it? Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill would give you strongly contrasting opinions. A person should not kill another to benefit five others. It would be a wrong thing to do, but Mill would disagree. Kant believed that good intentions count and that the morality of an action is determined by the intentions behind it rather than its consequences. Kant says that the consequences are irrelevant to assessments of moral worth, which contrasts sharply with Mill’s utilitarianism. Kant believed that the only appropriate motive for an action is a sense of duty. A person should only do something solely because it is the right thing to do, no other motive is just. He also thought that acting purely out of inclinations was not moral at all. Kant defined a maxim to be the underlying principles motivating an action which determines its moral worth, not the end result. Kant developed the categorical imperative which is based on his belief that morality is derived from rationality. Our book tells us that the categorical imperative is an absolute moral law to be upheld regardless of circumstances. He was a deontologist, meaning that he believed that moral judgement is contained in the action alone. His categorical imperative is broken down into three maxims. The first maxim is universality; which means that for an action to be moral in your circumstances, it mustShow MoreRelatedImmanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill1261 Words   |  6 Pagesintentions/character that insp ire the action, or the consequences that result from the action?† Second, the philosophers I am going to discuss throughout this paper are Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. Now before I tell you my answer to this question I am going to explain these who these two philosophers are and what their viewpoints on ethics are. Immanuel Kant was born in what is now Germany in 1724 and died in 1804 and was the type of philosopher to act out of duty. He believes that actions should be performedRead MoreImmanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill Essay2002 Words   |  9 Pagesmost widely known ethical philosophers are Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. While they may have philosophized around the same time period, the philosophers have very different ideas about ethics and happiness. Immanuel Kant, author of Duty and Reason, believed in the morality of the good will and duty. He espoused that happiness is an irrelevancy insofar as fulfilling duty is the most important aspect of leading a moral life. Conversely, John Stuart Mill, who wrote, The Greatest Happiness PrincipleRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill And Immanuel Kant1387 Words   |  6 Pagesdifferent philosophers. Two of these philosophers are John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Mill, in Utilitarianism defines happiness as pleasure without pain. He builds upon this idea of happiness when establishing his moral philosophy, stating that the action that would bring about the maximum amount of happiness is the most moral action. On the other hand, Kant establishes happiness as well-being and a satisfaction with one’s condition. Kant, however, argues that happiness is too fully based uponRead MoreImmanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill1206 Words   |  5 Pagesof morality, there is no right answer to dilemmas only different opinions. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers with two different views on a person’s moral conscious. Kant believes morality is a duty that people should hold above their own happiness. On the other hand, Mill believes happiness is the goal of morality and the more happiness is acquired at the end is the most moral. According to Immanuel Kant, morality is a duty people must hold above their own happiness. For somethingRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill And Immanuel Kant1786 Words   |  8 PagesJohn Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. They both had very different views when it came to the ethics of philosophy. They also though had some of the same views as each other. Both were concerned with the moral qualities of actions and choices of a person, but neither of them was much interested in about what makes a good person. They also different views and some of the same views when it came to lying. One thought it should never be done. The other thought it should be used as a last resort. FirstRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill And Immanuel Kant Essay1805 Words   |  8 Pagesphilosophers, Kant and Mill, to determine whether or not torture is ever ethical. John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant, both proposed different philosophies, using deontological and teleological theories in ethics. John Stuart Mill used a teleological theory, which prioritized the end result of an action, based off the moral nature of the action itself, compared to the deontological theory proposed by Kant, which presented actions as obligations of an individual, leading them to act in a certain way. Mill usedRead MoreImmanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill998 Words   |  4 PagesTwo knowledgeable men, one says go right, the other, left. Who is right? Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill were both noted philosophers with opposing theories on what is moral. Each uphold different ways of observing what is right. The theory of utilitarianism held by Mill and universalism held by Kant has similarities and diffe rences. Who stands correct, and who is mistaken? Utilitarianism is the belief that decisions should be made based on how much pleasure they bring (MacKinnon and FialaRead MoreImmanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill2050 Words   |  9 Pagesstraight forward as proposed by Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill in The Groundswork and Utilitarianism respectively. Kant, in The Groundswork, and Mill, in Utilitarianism, come to different conclusions about what is intrinsically good, yet neither of them come to a valid explanation for the following reasons; Kant produces a narrow view focused entirely on having a good will, acting only based off of duties, and ignoring the outcomes of your actions, while Mill calculates intrinsic value basedRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill vs. Immanuel Kant2163 Words   |  9 PagesJohn Stuart Mill vs. Immanuel Kant The aim of this paper is to clearly depict how John Stuart Mill’s belief to do good for all is more appropriate for our society than Immanuel Kant’s principle that it is better to do whats morally just. I will explain why Mill’s theory served as a better guide to moral behavior and differentiate between the rights and responsibilities of human beings to themselves and society. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of moralityRead MoreA Study Of Ethics By Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill992 Words   |  4 Pagesaround ethics. The court released Lavallee as innocent on the basis that she is medically ill with Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS). The two most renowned ethicists, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill would view this case differently. Kantianism is associated solely with Immanuel Kant. In comparison, John Stuart Mill, an opponent of Immanuel Kant’s ideas, uses a utilitarian approach. This essay will briefly give an overview of the case and the BWS. Then, it will show how both theories view the case.

Leadership Experience Essay Example For Students

Leadership Experience Essay Reading this interesting leadership experience essay will give everybody the valuable opportunity to truly understand how the role of the leader looks like in real life. There are many similar articles on this popular theme on the Internet. However, thanks to this one you have got a chance to look at the best leadership and personal leadership in a totally new as well as untypical way. Outline1 That person who leads1.1 Leaders:2 What it takes3 Summary That person who leads Everyone has probably heard something about the people who we call leaders and has their own opinion about the whole thing. We decided to say something about what are the common thoughts connected with the theme in this introduction. As it turns out, people usually often guess that leaders have a lot in common with bosses at work or with politicians. It is undoubtfully a right association, but it is not one hundred percent complete. Why is this a case here? It would be really difficult to argue that in a business environment humans often should be able to lead their team of co-workers in a professional way. However, the truth is that the famous word â€Å"leader† has so much more in it than just being a person who has a job in management. The real key, as well as the main idea of the leadership topic, is wide and not famous enough among the whole society which we get to live in nowadays. Let’s take a look at a few examples about who may be a human who leads other somewhere. Leaders: Chief at the company – that person is responsible for maintaining the growth of the whole firm which is a very important and difficult task; Politician – this is another popular leadership example, let’s just take a look at the president who is in charge of the whole big country and the entire nation; Headmaster or headmistress at the school – these people take care of the whole teaching institution, which has a crucial meaning for a number of different individuals, such as every scholarship college student, all of the teachers and also parents; Everybody – it may be found hard to believe by many people, but the reality shows that every person from plenty of different environments may play their own role in the important thing which is without a shadow of a doubt the best leadership. What does it actually mean? Everyone who makes their effort to stay in front of the group of humans may be called their master. What it takes You have probably wondered sometimes who the specific person must be in order to always show greatness at the leadership or personal leadership. Well, there may actually be found a lot of different things which make someone an individual who works well in charge of some other humans. However, there are some especially interesting as well as valuable examples which are the most important when it comes to the most significant leaders. You have the chance to look at them below right now: Responsibility Probably no one needs to be convinced that every human in charge of something important ought to be incredibly responsible. There is a number of complicated and meaningful things going on in the business environment, and you have to be able to manage all of them with the cation in order to the successful development of the specific company. Kindness This one may seem like it does not really have the real meaning. However, especially today in the twenty-first century all the people need to treat each other with respect if they want to feel good together. Personal leadership is not able to be powerful without being polite and open the world and everyone who lives in it. Strength .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 , .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .postImageUrl , .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 , .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4:hover , .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4:visited , .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4:active { border:0!important; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4:active , .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4 .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ue6e9db19ae0618c8965d6a9c751762e4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Dolls House By Ibsen EssayYou cannot be a weak person if you are the manager of the others. They rely on you so you must be the one who shares your strength with others every day. When we talk about leadership, my personal scholarship experience taught me that students who have the strongest psychological abilities are the ones who win awards and also get great marks at university. Creativity It is important to be both polite as well as powerful, but you also will not be able to make a real difference in the world without the rich imagination and unique vision. When you describe personal leadership, my piece of advice is to tell your audience something about the huge role played by creativity. Charisma This word sounds for many very interesting but not everybody knows what it exactly means. You have an opportunity to finally learn more about it. When it comes to leadership styles, there may be found many differences before some of them. It is good because everyone needs to be somehow a unique individual in order to succeed. This special kind of individualism which make someone special is called charisma and is very meaningful in the business environment. Summary We are getting closer and closer to the end of this unique text right about now. If you read this article with the real interest in the theme, you are probably able to remember a number of different things about something which people tend to describe leadership and personal leadership. Let’s take it all together in the short form once again in order to get the final clear picture of who the leader really is and what you can say about this person. Read this, and you will become much closer to be the master of knowledge in this valuable field. In my personal leadership conclusion, leadership will be explained one more time in an easy way. Bosses at huge firms, politicians, headmasters, and basically everyone can be put in charge of others. However, this role is not as simple as it may seem for some people who are not familiar with the whole idea of it. Leadership requires from an individual to always try and be a responsible, strong, kind, creative and charismatic person. Thank you for your attention and may you be the incredible leader whatever you do in your life.